Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 206 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Robinson v. Huron Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion) 2014-1195Criminal procedure-Mandamus for resentencing barred by res judicata.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-1553 4/28/2015 4/28/2015 2015-Ohio-1553
State ex rel. McCuller v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion) 2014-1197Mandamus-Procedendo-Bindover orders from 1979 allegedly not signed by judge or journalized by clerk-Writ ordering judge to proceed to judgment properly denied-Petitioner had adequate remedies at law or meaningful relief not available.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-1563 4/28/2015 4/28/2015 2015-Ohio-1563
State v. Castagnola (Slip Opinion) 2013-0781Search-warrant affiant's undisclosed evidentiary inference stated as an empirical fact usurped the inference-drawing authority of the magistrate who issued the warrant in reliance on the affidavit-The particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment applies to the search of a computer and requires a search warrant to particularly describe the items believed to be contained on the computer with as much specificity as the affiant's knowledge and the circumstances of the case allow and that the search be conducted in a manner that restricts the search for the items identified.Kennedy, J.Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-1565 4/28/2015 4/28/2015 2015-Ohio-1565
04/28/2015 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Motion and procedural rulings-Mediation matters.   4/28/2015 4/28/2015 2015-Ohio-1612
04/27/2015 Administrative Actions  Administrative actions.   4/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-Ohio-1587
04/27/2015 Administrative Actions #2  Administrative actions.   4/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-Ohio-1588
4/27/2015 Case Announcements #2  Miscellaneous dismissals.   4/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-Ohio-1589
04/27/2015 Case Announcements  Official versions released.   4/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-Ohio-1590
4/24/2015 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings-Miscellaneous dismissals.   4/24/2015 4/24/2015 2015-Ohio-1564
4/24/2015 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   4/24/2015 4/24/2015 2015-Ohio-1566
12345678910...>>