Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 7 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Ross 2016-P-0060RAPE & OTHER SEX CRIMES - law requires no further activity to constitute cunnilingus beyond placing one's mouth on the female's vagina; rape victim's testimony, if believed, is sufficient to convict appellant of rape. CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - expert's opinion testimony on whether there was sexual abuse would aid jurors in making their decision and is thus admissible per Evid.R. 702 and 704; expert may not testify as to expert's opinion of veracity of statements of child declarant who claims she has been raped; expert's testimony that behavior of alleged child victim of sexual abuse is consistent with behavior observed in sexually abused children is admissible.RicePortage 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-452
State v. Bernard 2017-A-0063CRIMINAL LAW - aggravated robbery; aggravated burglary; felonious assault; kidnapping; jury trial; judgments reversed and convictions vacated; appellant was denied a fair trial because of the admission of prejudicial other acts evidence pursuant to Evid.R. 404(B); the evidence presented is not sufficient to support appellant's convictions as a matter of law; the jury verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence.O'TooleAshtabula 1/29/2018 1/29/2018 2018-Ohio-351
In re H.J. 2017-A-0068JUVENILE - termination of parental rights; presumption of abandonment; R.C. 2151.011(C); weight of the evidenceGrendellAshtabula 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 2018-Ohio-206
State v. Hudson 2014-T-0097CRIMINAL LAW - sufficient evidence to support enhanced possession of cocaine conviction; possession of cocaine conviction established via sufficient evidence; circumstantial evidence of constructive possession of cocaine; personal items in locked bedroom.WrightTrumbull 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 2018-Ohio-133
State v. Skeins 2017-T-0018CRIMINAL LAW - rape and gross sexual imposition offenses supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence; conflicting testimony for trier of fact to resolve; sentence of 25 years to life required via R.C. 2971.03(B)(1) based on penalty enhancement since jury found victim was compelled to submit by force or threat of force. WrightTrumbull 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 2018-Ohio-134
State ex rel. Hudson v. Sloan 2017-T-0030EXTRAORDINARY WRITS - alternative writs seeking release from prison; prior decision reversing and vacating penalty enhancement based on Supreme Court's decision that was subsequently reconsidered; State v. Gonzales, 150 Ohio St.3d 276, 2017-Ohio-777, 81 N.E.3d 419; summary judgment appropriate in warden's favor because Hudson is not entitled to release as a matter of law. WrightTrumbull 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 2018-Ohio-135
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Brannon 2017-T-0105APPELLATE REVIEW - R.C. 2505.02(B); appeal from an entry granting leave to file a motion for summary judgment is not a final appealable order.O'TooleTrumbull 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 2018-Ohio-136