Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 209 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Kraemer v. Kraemer CA2017-08-120In a custody dispute, Mother, a Kentucky resident, appeals the domestic relation court's decision denying Mother's motion to transfer jurisdiction to Kentucky and declare Ohio an inconvenient forum. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mother's motion to transfer jurisdiction where the evidence did not establish that Ohio was an inconvenient forum to determine the custody dispute.RinglandButler 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3847
State v. Mize CA2017-12-159Appellant's sentence is not blended because the trial court sentenced appellant to two separate sentences, one including prison time and one including community control, for appellant's two separate offenses.PiperButler 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3848
State v. Lynch CA2017-12-182The trial court did not err by sentencing appellant to serve nine consecutive 12-month prison terms as a result of his guilty plea to nine counts of burglary, all third-degree felonies, where the trial court properly considered the necessary sentencing statutes prior to issuing its sentencing decision.S. PowellButler 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3849
State v. Sigman CA2018-01-002Appellant's conviction for child endangering was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence because appellant allowed a child that was in his control to ride on a zero-turn lawnmower. The child was thrown off of the lawnmower and had his hand cut off when the child's arm was caught under the lawnmower's deck.PiperFayette 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3850
State v. Sanchez CA2017-11-020Trial court did not err by imposing a mandatory fine or imposing an eight-year prison term where appellant had a present or future ability to pay the mandatory fine and the sentencing decision was not contrary to law.RinglandMadison 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3851
State v. Porter CA2017-07-101, CA2017-07-103A sentencing court may not award jail time credit for time spent on house arrest, confirming this court's decision in State v. Porter, 12th Dist. Warren Nos. CA2017-07-101 and CA2017-07-103, 2018-Ohio-3123 and overruling our prior decision in State v. Fillinger, 12th Dist. CA2015-04-015, 2016-Ohio-8455.Per CuriamWarren 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3852
In re P.L.H. CA2018-01-009Juvenile court did not commit plain error dismissing putative father's Civ.R. 60(B) request for relief where he failed to demonstrate grounds for relief.PiperButler 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3853
Suwareh v. Nwankwo CA2017-12-174The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a modification of Father's parenting time after considering the best interest factors set forth in R.C. 3109.04(F)(1), including the parent's wishes, the children's relationships with their parents, the distance between the two parents' residences, and the children's ages and schooling needs. However, as the trial court's order governing the exercise of parenting-time during religious holidays that occurred during the school year was ambiguous, the matter was remanded for further proceedings.HendricksonButler 9/17/2018 9/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3737
State v. Braunskill CA2018-03-006The trial court properly treated appellant's motion for resentencing as a petition for postconviction relief, which was untimely filed, and the arguments therein were barred by res judicata because they could have been argued on direct appeal.PiperClermont 9/17/2018 9/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3738
Johnson v. Miller CA2017-12-021Defendant defaulted on a promissory note and appeals the trial court's decision granting judgment on the note and ordering foreclosure of defendant's properties. Competent, credible evidence established that the terms of the promissory note and mortgages were mutually agreed upon by the parties and the agreements were supported by sufficient consideration.M. PowellMadison 9/17/2018 9/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3739