Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 175 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Beach CA2017-01-008Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6938
In re M.T. CA2017-03-032Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6939
State v. Woodard CA2016-09-084Appellant's convictions for possession of heroin and aggravated possession of drugs were supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where appellant admitted he handed another inmate a controlled substance, a corrections officer observed the handoff, and the baggie of drugs tested positive for heroin and fentanyl. Trial court did not err in concluding that appellant's convictions were not allied offenses of similar import as the simultaneous possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses that do not merge.HendricksonWarren 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6941
State v. Graves CA2016-11-096R.C. 959.13(A)(3) is neither unconstitutionally vague as applied to defendant nor overbroad. Defendant's conviction for cruelty to animals for leaving his dog in a sealed vehicle for over 40 minutes on a hot, sunny, and very humid day was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. M. PowellWarren 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6942
State v. Belcher CA2016-12-102The state of Ohio does not have the right to appeal a grant of judicial release under R.C. 2953.08(B) on the ground it is contrary to law because a grant of judicial release is a sentence modification and the state can only appeal a sentence as being contrary to law.M. PowellWarren 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6943
State v. McCaleb CA2016-12-103Trial court did nor err by denying appellant's motions to dismiss where he was tried within the statutory speedy trial period and no violation of his constitutional speedy trial rights occurredM. PowellWarren 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6944
State v. Petersen CA2016-11-074Appellant's five-year sentence for felonious assault was supported by the record and was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the court considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors of R.C. 2929.12, imposed the required mandatory three-year postrelease control term, and sentenced appellant within the statutory range for a second-degree felony.HendricksonClermont 7/24/2017 7/24/2017 2017-Ohio-6940
In re J.A. CA2016-09-175Trial court did not err by finding that it was in the best interest of the child for legal custody to be granted in favor of her paternal aunt. Although the former foster parents provided excellent care to the child while in their placement, there were other factors that supported the juvenile court's decision. RinglandButler 7/17/2017 7/17/2017 2017-Ohio-5848
Cook v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp. CA2017-01-004Employer appeals jury verdict entitling worker to participate in workers' compensation fund. Trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in instructing jurors that they need not be certain of the date of the worker's injury, only that the worker proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was injured in the course of his employment.PiperButler 7/17/2017 7/17/2017 2017-Ohio-5849
State v. Rowley CA2016-10-019Trial court did not commit plain error admitting National Precursor Log Exchange ("NPLEx") reports where reports met the requirements of Evid.R. 803(6).HendricksonClinton 7/17/2017 7/17/2017 2017-Ohio-5850
12345678910...>>