Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 118 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Muscioni v. Binette E-17-018Sua sponte dismissal of application for a writ of mandamus because the issue of jail time credit must be raised in a direct appeal.SingerErie 4/24/2017 4/25/2017 2017-Ohio-1522
Howard v. Hawkins L-16-1087A trial court abuses its discretion when it allows a defendant to file an answer out of time absent a showing of excusable neglect. A contract is not lawfully binding on a party when there is fraud or forgery in procuring the party's signature. The judgment of the trial court was amply supported by competent, credible evidence where appellant failed to meet her burden of proving the existence of a lawful contract. SingerLucas 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1473
Martin v. Block Communications, Inc. L-16-1213Trial court did not err in: finding that appellant did not have a right to amend his complaint because he failed to file an amended complaint within the time allowed under Civ.R. 15(A); denying appellant's motion for leave to amend because the proposed amended complaint did not cure the pleading deficiencies; or considering appellees' Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss the original complaint because it was the only pleading before the trial court. Judgment affirmed.MayleLucas 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1474
Pike-Delta-York Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Pike-Delta-York Edn. Assn. F-16-006Arbitration. Arbitrator exceeded his powers and imperfectly executed his powers so that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made. R.C. 2711.10(D). Trial court did not err in vacating arbitrator's award. No evidence of material mistake or extensive impropriety by trial court.SingerFulton 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1476
Pittman v. Parillo L-16-1140Trial court properly granted summary judgment to appellees. Judgment affirmed.OsowikLucas 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1477
State v. Reynolds L-16-1021Felony murder conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where trial judge, acting as finder of fact, chose to give more weight to state's expert who opined that defendant was not criminally insane at the time of the offense. Also, trial counsel's decision not to file motion to suppress police interview of defendant will not support case of ineffective assistance of trial counsel where there was no showing that such a motion, if granted, would have changed the outcome of the case.MayleLucas 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1478
State v. Wright E-15-044R.C. 2941.401 accelerated speedy trial time limit not exceeded; Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial not violated; ineffective assistance of counsel claim not supported.SingerErie 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1479
State v. Johnson S-16-015, S-16-036Trial court did not err in sentencing appellant. Judgment affirmed.OsowikSandusky 4/21/2017 4/21/2017 2017-Ohio-1480
In re A.J. L-16-1258Anders appeal. The trial court did not err when it terminated appellant's parental rights because the decision was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The child could not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time and should not be placed with either parent, and termination of appellant's parental rights was in the child's best interest. Judgment affirmed.MayleLucas 4/14/2017 4/14/2017 2017-Ohio-1392
Clinage v. Smith L-16-1192Petitioner established that an act of domestic violence caused her to file her petition for a civil protection order, and she also relied on past conduct of the respondent to establish a genuine fear of future violence.SingerLucas 4/14/2017 4/14/2017 2017-Ohio-1393
12345678910...>>